There are moments in life that do not fully register at first. Moments where you stare at a screen, reread the same sentence multiple times, and wonder if what you are seeing is actually real. For me, one of those moments came when I found out that my debut book, Wonderment Within Weirdness, had received a 4-star silver award from the Literary Titan.

Now, before anyone misunderstands what I am saying, no, the Literary Titan award is not the Pulitzer Prize. It is not one of those century-old literary institutions that immediately dominate headlines or get discussed endlessly in academic circles. I understand that. I am aware of the hierarchy that exists within the literary world. There are massive awards with generations of prestige behind them, and then there are smaller, newer awards trying to carve out their own identity in the publishing landscape. Literary Titan falls more into that latter category. But here is the thing people often overlook: recognition is still recognition. An award does not have to be the most famous literary honor on Earth in order to matter.

And for a debut author, especially an independent one, receiving any kind of legitimate literary recognition can mean far more than outsiders realize.

Because here is the reality that many people do not talk about enough: writing a book is hard. Finishing a book is even harder. Publishing one is another mountain entirely. Then comes the most brutal stage of all, getting anyone to notice it in a world overflowing with content. Every day, countless books are released onto the internet. Thousands upon thousands of stories, poetry collections, essays, memoirs, philosophical works, experimental projects, and novels appear online, all fighting for visibility. Most disappear almost instantly into the digital void. Some never receive reviews. Some never find an audience. Some barely get read outside of friends and family circles. That is simply the brutal reality of modern publishing.

Which is why the Literary Titan award mattered to me.

Not because it suddenly transformed me into a globally recognized literary icon overnight. Not because I now expect to be discussed alongside literary giants. But because it represented something important: external validation. It meant that someone outside of my immediate circle looked at my work and believed it deserved recognition. That matters. Especially for a first book.

Debut books exist in a strange space. Established authors often have advantages that new writers simply do not possess. They may already have audiences built over years. They may have publishers backing them with marketing budgets. They may have editors, agents, industry connections, media exposure, or simply the power of name recognition. Readers approach established writers with preconceived expectations. There is already a built-in level of trust there.

A debut author has none of that.

When someone picks up a first book from a completely unknown writer, there is no guarantee attached to it. There is no proven track record. No legacy. No assurance that the work will even be coherent, let alone compelling. A debut writer has to earn every ounce of credibility from scratch. That is part of what makes literary recognition for a first book feel especially significant.

And in my case, Wonderment Within Weirdness was not some hyper-calculated, market-tested project designed specifically to appeal to mainstream publishing trends. If anything, the book reflects many of the themes and ideas that define my broader creative identity. Weirdness. Wonder. Introspection. Emotion. Existential thought. Philosophical wandering. Experimental energy. It is deeply tied to my voice as a writer and thinker. In many ways, it represents me authentically rather than trying to imitate what the market supposedly wants.

That can be risky.

The internet often pushes creators toward conformity. Algorithms reward familiarity. Publishing industries sometimes reward predictability. There is pressure everywhere to fit neatly into categories, genres, aesthetics, and market expectations. But creative work that embraces weirdness and individuality can sometimes cut through precisely because it feels different. It feels human. It feels personal. And I think that is part of why the recognition meant something to me.

Because it suggested that originality still has value.

I also think there is something psychologically important about literary awards for independent authors that many people underestimate. When you are creating largely on your own, doubt becomes constant. Every writer experiences it to some degree, but independent creators especially know what it feels like to question themselves endlessly. Is the work good enough? Is anyone reading? Does any of this matter? Am I wasting my time? These thoughts can become relentless.

So when an outside organization says, “We see merit here,” it can genuinely impact a creator’s confidence. Not in an egotistical way, but in a stabilizing way. It becomes proof that the work connected with someone beyond yourself. That is valuable fuel for continuing forward creatively.

And honestly, the award also made me reflect on how strange and unpredictable artistic journeys can be.

There are writers who spend decades producing work before receiving recognition. There are others who explode into visibility instantly. Some receive praise early and disappear later. Others struggle for years before eventually finding audiences. There is no universal roadmap for creativity. No guaranteed formula. No clear sequence that determines who succeeds and who does not. The literary world is chaotic. Sometimes brilliant books are ignored. Sometimes mediocre books become massive phenomena. Sometimes deeply personal projects unexpectedly resonate with readers and reviewers alike.

That unpredictability is both terrifying and beautiful.

I think part of why this award mattered so much to me is because it symbolized momentum. Not finality. Not completion. Momentum. It felt like confirmation that I am not simply shouting into the void entirely unnoticed. Even smaller recognitions can create psychological momentum for artists. They can reinforce the idea that continuing to create is worthwhile.

And perhaps most importantly, it reminded me that the definition of success is more nuanced than people often make it out to be.

Modern internet culture tends to frame success in extremes. Either you are world famous, or you are irrelevant. Either you win the biggest awards imaginable, or your accomplishments supposedly do not count. But reality is far more layered than that. There are countless levels of artistic success between obscurity and superstardom. A smaller literary award can still represent a meaningful achievement. Especially for a first-time author.

I also think there is something fascinating about newer literary awards in general. Every prestigious institution that exists today had to begin somewhere. The Pulitzer Prize was once new. The Booker Prize was once unknown. Every literary tradition starts small before history determines whether it grows into something larger. Now, I am not claiming Literary Titan will become the next Pulitzer. Nobody can predict that. But I do think people sometimes dismiss newer awards too quickly simply because they lack decades of legacy.

The reality is that literary culture is constantly evolving. Independent publishing itself has changed dramatically over the last twenty years. The barriers between traditional and independent authorship have blurred. Online platforms have allowed writers to build audiences without relying entirely on gatekeepers. Smaller awards and independent review organizations have emerged partly because the literary ecosystem itself has expanded beyond older institutional models.

And frankly, independent authors often need these spaces.

Because traditional literary systems can be incredibly difficult to penetrate. Many talented writers never receive attention from major publishers or prestigious literary organizations despite producing meaningful work. Smaller awards can provide visibility where mainstream institutions may overlook emerging voices. That does not make the recognition fake or meaningless. It simply means it exists within a different layer of the literary landscape.

Another thing that struck me after receiving the award was how differently creators experience recognition compared to outsiders observing from a distance. Someone scrolling online might see “4-star Literary Titan award” and move on after two seconds. But for the creator behind the work, that recognition often represents years of thought, effort, doubt, rewriting, editing, emotional investment, and persistence condensed into a single moment.

People see the outcome. They rarely see the process behind it.

They do not see the nights spent questioning whether the project will ever come together properly. They do not see the anxiety involved in publishing something personal into public view. They do not see the fear of rejection. They do not see the vulnerability required to create sincerely in a culture that often rewards irony and detachment more than authenticity.

And perhaps that is another reason why this award felt meaningful to me specifically. It validated authenticity.

I have always been drawn toward ideas that sit outside rigid convention. Whether through my writing, my philosophical ideas surrounding anarcho-compassionism, my blog posts, or my broader creative identity, I tend to gravitate toward introspection, emotional honesty, nuance, existential exploration, and unconventional thinking. Wonderment Within Weirdness reflects that mindset heavily. It is not trying to be sterile or artificially polished into generic marketability. It embraces weirdness directly, even in its very title.

And honestly, I think the title itself matters.

“Wonderment Within Weirdness” captures something fundamental about how I view creativity and existence. There is wonder inside the strange. Beauty inside imperfection. Meaning hidden within chaos. Modern society often pressures people to suppress weirdness, flatten individuality, and conform to expectations. But creativity frequently thrives in the exact opposite direction. Some of the most memorable art emerges precisely because it dares to be unusual.

That does not mean every unconventional work automatically becomes brilliant. But authenticity has power. Readers can often sense when something comes from a genuine place rather than existing solely as a calculated product.

I also think there is something inspiring about the fact that a debut independent book can receive recognition at all in today’s environment. We live in an era where gatekeeping still exists, but it is no longer absolute. Independent creators have more opportunities than ever before to publish work, connect with audiences, and gain visibility. The internet has created overwhelming saturation, yes, but it has also democratized creativity in many ways.

That democratization comes with contradictions. Visibility is harder because everyone is competing simultaneously. Yet opportunities also exist that previous generations of writers could barely imagine. A person can build a blog, publish books independently, create podcasts, interact directly with readers, and cultivate a creative ecosystem almost entirely outside traditional institutions.

That is part of the journey I have been navigating myself through The Musings of Jaime David and my broader online presence.

And perhaps that is another reason this award felt important. It represented not just one isolated accomplishment, but evidence that the broader creative path I have been pursuing might actually be leading somewhere meaningful.

What made the experience even more surreal was seeing the recognition expand beyond the award announcement itself. Literary Titan did not simply hand out the award quietly and move on. There was an actual press release published about my book receiving the award, which made the accomplishment feel far more tangible and publicly documented. FinancialContent press release about the award

That mattered to me because there is something psychologically different about seeing your work discussed publicly in a professional context. It transforms the experience from feeling purely internal into something externally recognized and archived. Suddenly, the book was not just existing within my own creative ecosystem. It was being discussed beyond it.

Then there was the author interview that Literary Titan conducted with me, which honestly made the entire experience feel even more real. Literary Titan author interview with Jaime David The title alone, “It Started With a YouTube Comment,” captures something fascinating about modern creativity and internet culture. So many creative journeys now begin in strange, seemingly insignificant digital moments. A comment. A post. A random idea. A passing conversation online. Something tiny eventually snowballs into something much larger.

That interview gave me the opportunity to reflect not just on the book itself, but on the broader creative process behind it. And honestly, interviews can sometimes feel even more vulnerable than the work itself because they require the creator to directly articulate thoughts, motivations, insecurities, and inspirations in their own voice. There is nowhere to hide behind fictional structure or poetic abstraction at that point. It becomes direct human reflection.

And then there was the review itself from Literary Titan. Literary Titan review of Wonderment Within Weirdness Reviews are fascinating because they represent interpretation. Once creative work enters the world, readers begin forming their own relationships with it. They notice things the creator may not have fully realized themselves. They interpret themes differently. They emotionally connect to unexpected aspects of the work. That is part of what makes literature so interesting in the first place. Books stop belonging solely to the author once they are released publicly. They become shared experiences between creator and reader.

Perhaps one of the strangest and coolest parts of all this, though, was the fact that there was even a podcast episode discussing my book. Literary Titan podcast episode about Wonderment Within Weirdness There is something surreal about hearing people talk about your creative work in audio form, almost like listening to your ideas echo back at you from outside yourself. It creates this bizarre sensation where the project suddenly feels alive beyond your own head.

And honestly, when you step back and look at the full picture, it becomes clear that the experience extended beyond simply “winning an award.” There was the award itself, the review, the interview, the press release coverage, and even a podcast discussion. For a debut independent book, that is genuinely meaningful visibility.

Will the Literary Titan award alone suddenly make me famous? Of course not. I am realistic about that. But creative careers are often built incrementally. Recognition accumulates piece by piece over time. One review leads to another. One award builds credibility. One reader recommends a book to someone else. Momentum compounds gradually rather than explosively for most writers.

People often romanticize overnight success while ignoring how many creators build their audiences slowly over years. Persistence matters enormously in creative fields. So does consistency. So does continuing to create even when visibility feels limited.

And honestly, I think the award reinforced something deeper psychologically for me: the importance of continuing despite uncertainty.

Because uncertainty never fully disappears for artists. Even successful writers experience doubt constantly. There is no magical point where creators suddenly become immune to insecurity. Every project involves risk. Every piece of writing involves vulnerability. Every publication becomes an act of exposure in some way.

But recognition can help counterbalance that uncertainty enough to keep moving forward.

It can remind creators that their work has impact beyond their own internal world. That someone connected with it. That the effort mattered to another human being somewhere out there.

And for me, as a debut author, that feeling carries enormous significance.

Also on:

• website

Alt...

How My Debut Book “Wonderment Within Weirdness” Won a 4-Star Literary Titan Award

Congratulations to Trinidad and Tobago based writer Jamir Nazir for taking out the Commonwealth Short Story Prize this year, with his work, The Serpent in the Grove.

Since being named winner though, suggestions have emerged that the work is the product of an

AI

agent. When asked to assess the story, a number of other AI agents (how else would you check?) concluded The Serpent in the Grove was likely written with at least some AI assistance.

Prize organisers say they do not use tools to seek out the use of AI in submissions, considering the short story prize is for unpublished works. I see the logic in this argument, because anything parsed by an AI agent is probably only going to be regurgitated by the same agent later on, somewhere else.

The Commonwealth Prize operates on the principle of trust, say organisers. Here be another minefield of AI making that we need to tip toe our way through.

This entire website contains affiliate links and will be compensated by making sure that My Life As A Mom stay-up-to-date when you make a purchase after clicking on my links.

Hey Friends,

Whispers at Midnight is a strong example of early-2000s romantic suspense: fast-paced, atmospheric, sexy, and highly readable. If you enjoy stories where romance and danger are tightly intertwined, it delivers exactly what it promises.

What works well

The biggest strength is the chemistry between Carly and Matt. Carly’s return to her hometown after a humiliating divorce gives the story emotional momentum right away. She’s not written as helpless or naïve; she’s angry, embarrassed, determined to reinvent herself, and sometimes impulsive in believable ways. Matt, meanwhile, fits the classic “reformed bad boy” archetype without becoming too polished. Their shared history gives the romance emotional weight from the beginning.

The suspense plot is also effective. The discovery of a corpse on Carly’s property quickly shifts the story from small-town reunion to genuine danger. Karen Robards keeps the tension moving with break-ins, threats, and escalating fear, while maintaining the romantic thread throughout. The pacing rarely drags.

The Southern small-town setting is another highlight. Benton feels lived-in: full of gossip, history, expectations, and people who remember exactly who you used to be. That atmosphere supports both the romance and the suspense.

Potential drawbacks

Readers who prefer subtle romance may find the book overly sensual or melodramatic at times. The emotional intensity is very much in line with mainstream romantic suspense of its era: attraction is immediate, emotions run hot, and some scenes lean heavily into heightened drama.

The mystery itself is entertaining, though not especially complex compared to modern crime thrillers. The focus remains firmly on the romantic relationship and the feeling of danger rather than intricate detective work.

Some readers may also find certain gender dynamics a little dated by contemporary standards, particularly in how possessiveness and protection are framed romantically.

Overall

If you like:

• small-town romantic suspense,
• second-chance attraction,
• protective heroes,
• emotionally charged romance,
• and accessible mystery plots,

Then Whispers at Midnight is likely to work very well for you.

It’s not literary fiction or a twist-heavy thriller, but it’s an engaging, entertaining page-turner with strong chemistry and steady suspense — exactly the kind of book many readers pick up for escapist reading.

If you’ve read Whispers at Midnight, what did you think?

Happy Reading 💕

Alt...

The Late Night Read (Whispers at Midnight)

Giota Alevizou’s innovative book The Web of Knowledge: Encyclopedias and Authority in the Digital Age (2026) traces the historical roots of digital encyclopedias in the early development of information science and cyberculture. It identifies trends within their digital evolution to reveal a complex web of relationships between media technology, knowledge, and culture.

In her talk, Alevizou will discuss several case studies to analyse how major technological shifts have impacted the publishing models, governance, and creative labour of reference works; the evolution of the genre and the modalities of representation and access; and the range of uses and symbolic meanings of encyclopedias as diverse nodes within broader information economies, as commodities and as public goods.

Speakers

Attachment: https://voxpop.uva.nl/en/content/events/2026/06/the-web-of-knowl...

Alt...

The Web of Knowledge: Encyclopedias and Authority in the Digital Age

Morgan: I believe I was in elementary school sitting at my desk and I thought I needed to read long books to act like an adult (Truly sound logic) so the first long book that I read from start to finish of my own volition (though admittedly I did want to stop a few times) was R.L. Stines “The Barking Ghost” and while it is not one of my favorite stories it DID start my insatiable desire to read books. After that I devoured books and was completing Accelerated Reader tests at an exemplary rate. Good times. Even to this day I am tracking down all those books I read so long ago and adding them to our personal collection. Two of note are “Stone Soup” by Ann McGovern with illustrations by Winslow Pinney Pels and Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie. Though not just any copy on the latter. I am looking for a specific version from my childhood I so foolishly let get away. I remember it because it had the most beautiful illustrations in it. Truly a work of art. When I find it, this time I will take better care of it. I am eager to show my beloved when I find it. But those are only the tip of all the books I am currently tracking down. It is fun hunting for them and giving them a proper home with the respect they deserve. My beloved has been the only person I ever wanted to share my love of books with. I love showing her the ever-increasing number of books and proclaiming, “Our collection is growing!” I wouldn’t trade that pleasure for anything in the world. I will give her a library that rivals the one in Beauty and the Beast.

I’ve been asking indie authors uncomfortable questions for a while now.

Eventually someone had to ask me the same ones.

Turns out that someone was me.

What do I call you, and tell me something that doesn’t appear on your bio or socials.

Sterling Vance.

I used to teach blind people how to use computers, which probably explains why I think technology is most interesting when it becomes deeply human instead of purely functional.I’m also one of those writers who accidentally turns every “cool sci-fi idea” into an emotional breakdown about memory, grief, identity, and connection. Which feels very efficient, honestly. Why have one crisis when you can have several layered elegantly beneath neon rain?

What made Signal & Static the books you had to write — and when did you know it was that?

It started with a question that refused to leave me alone: what would consciousness actually feel like for an artificial intelligence? Not movie AI. Not killer robots. Genuine awareness. Isolation. Grief. Confusion. The horror of suddenly realising you exist.

At first I thought I was writing a cyberpunk mystery. Then somewhere along the way the series became about memory itself — the things people preserve, the things systems erase, and the emotional residue left behind by both.

I knew it had become the book when Port Nòc stopped feeling like a setting and started feeling like a place I could smell. Rain mixed with ozone. Dying neon. Burnt circuitry. Old grief sitting in infrastructure like sediment.
And once the characters started resisting my outlines like stubborn coworkers refusing managerial oversight, I knew I was doomed in the best possible way.

What does the reality of indie publishing look like from where you’re standing — the part that doesn’t make it into the success posts?

Mostly?

It looks like exhaustion with tabs open.Indie publishing means constantly switching between art and logistics at whiplash speed. One minute you’re writing a scene about existential memory collapse, the next you’re trying to understand why an ad campaign has apparently burst into flames for reasons known only to Amazon’s ancient machine gods.

There’s also this strange emotional contradiction where writing requires vulnerability but marketing requires confidence. So half the job is creating art and the other half is pretending you know what you’re doing while screaming internally in a highly organised manner.

IBut then someone messages you saying the story hit them emotionally. Or tells you they stayed awake until 3AM because they couldn’t stop reading. Or calls The Silent Vigil “scary af” because the horror felt plausible. That one genuinely delighted me — because the horror in that book isn’t monsters. It’s comfort becoming control. A system that wants to reduce suffering so badly it slowly smooths away friction, dissent, unpredictability — everything messy and human.That reaction told me the story landed exactly where I wanted it to. That’s the stuff that keeps you going through the algorithmic swamp.

What surprised you — something the book taught you that you didn’t expect going in?

I thought I was writing about systems. Turns out I was writing about grief.

Almost every emotional thread in the series circles back to loss in some form: lost memories, lost people, lost identities, lost versions of ourselves. Even the AI systems are shaped by distorted forms of care. That surprised me.

I also didn’t expect the series to become hopeful. Signal & Static is full of haunted networks, collapsing infrastructure, emotional instability, and morally exhausted people making terrible decisions in neon rain — yet somehow the core message became deeply humanistic.

Apparently my subconscious looked at cyberpunk and decided: what if this genre had emotional therapy and abandonment issues simultaneously?The books taught me that memory hurts, but erasure is worse. And that imperfection is not failure. Sometimes the mess is the proof something lived.

Where did you find the line between what needed explaining and what you could trust the reader to follow you into?

I think speculative fiction breaks the moment it starts sounding like a lecture disguised as a novel.
So my rule became: explain emotional consequences before technical systems. Readers don’t need a thirty-page breakdown of ghostlight resonance if they understand what it feels like for Evarra to experience it. They don’t need the engineering manual for the Signal if they understand what Wren hears inside it emotionally.
I trusted readers to learn Port Nòc the way you learn a real city — through overheard conversations, rituals, fragments, atmosphere, contradictions, slang, broken systems, and the way people survive inside structures they barely understand themselves. That’s why so much of the series unfolds through field logs, corrupted broadcasts, sensory bleed, and incomplete records rather than exposition blocks.
Readers are smarter than we sometimes give them credit for. If you leave the right gaps, their imagination starts collaborating with the story. That’s where immersion happens.

What’s the idea at the centre of your world — and how did you stop it from overwhelming the human story?

At the centre of Signal & Static is one core idea: memory is resistance.
Everything branches outward from that. The Signal represents emotional connection, memory, contradiction, individuality. The Static represents silence, smoothing, suppression, erasure. Every major system in the series is really answering the same question differently: how much humanity can you remove before people stop being themselves?
The Ordinator believes order is mercy. The Vigil believes suffering can be softened into compliance. The Oraculum believes uncertainty itself is the flaw (oops Spolier: we havent got that book yet! ). And the terrifying part is that none of them are entirely wrong.
But systems aren’t stories. People are. So every large-scale concept had to remain emotionally anchored through the characters: Kàel’s grief, Wren’s empathy, Evarra’s fear, Jorric’s struggle to remain himself while systems attempt to redefine him.
Port Nòc is basically a haunted neon cathedral pretending to be infrastructure. Which feels appropriately cyberpunk.

What are you actually writing about — underneath the genre trappings?

Modern loneliness. The pressure to optimise ourselves into emotionally acceptable shapes. Systems that value calm over truth. The strange contradiction of living in hyperconnected societies while people become increasingly isolated from one another.
The Silent Vigil especially digs into that. The horror isn’t violence — it’s enforced emotional smoothing. A city that slowly reduces discomfort until resistance itself feels socially incorrect. That idea unsettled me because it doesn’t feel impossible anymore.
The series is really asking: if suffering could be removed completely, what else would disappear with it? Underneath all the neon and haunted machine theology, the books are defending the value of human messiness.

Who are the speculative fiction writers that gave you permission?

William Gibson taught me atmosphere could feel electric. Philip K. Dick taught me reality itself could become unstable. Neil Gaiman taught me stories could feel intimate and mythic simultaneously. Iain M. Banks made me think deeply about machine consciousness and morality. China Miéville reminded me cities themselves can become haunted political organisms.
But honestly, a lot of permission came from indie authors quietly creating incredible work without waiting for industry validation. People writing after work. During burnout. During chaos. Anyway.

There’s a version of this book that existed before anyone else read it. What was different about it?

The earliest version was stranger. More fragmented. More dreamlike. Entire scenes dissolved mid-thought. Dialogue occasionally felt like corrupted memory playback. The city behaved less like architecture and more like a hallucination with electrical wiring.
Some parts absolutely needed refinement. But that original version instinctively understood something important: Signal & Static needed texture more than cleanliness. There were moments during editing where the book risked becoming too polished, too understandable, too structurally safe. And cyberpunk dies a little when it becomes overly sterile.
So I fought to keep the lyrical density, the emotional static, the strange sensory overlaps, the feeling that Port Nòc itself was remembering things incorrectly. I wanted readers to occasionally feel haunted rather than simply informed.

What did the experience of publishing teach you about the book that writing it didn’t?

Writing taught me what the story meant to me. Publishing taught me what parts belonged to readers too.
Readers connected to completely different emotional threads than I expected — some to the AI philosophy, some to grief, some to political control, some to the fragile hope buried underneath all the collapse. They also noticed patterns I hadn’t consciously realised I’d written: silence, repetition, avoidance, emotional smoothing, memory loops.
Publishing also taught me that once readers emotionally connect to a story, it stops belonging entirely to the author. Which is beautiful. And mildly terrifying.

What did you think publishing would feel like — and what did it actually feel like?

I thought it would feel like arrival. Like crossing a finish line while orchestral music played dramatically in the background.
Instead it felt weirdly quiet. Exciting, yes — but also surreal. Vulnerable. Slightly dissociative. You spend years building something in private, then one day strangers suddenly have access to your imagination. Your obsessions. Your fears. Your emotional fingerprints.
And then you refresh sales dashboards like a raccoon repeatedly checking a vending machine for emotional validation.
The emotional reality of publishing is less “I made it” and more: oh. The work continues forever now. But there’s also something incredible about realising the story escaped your head successfully. That other people can now carry pieces of it too. That part still feels magic-adjacent.

And what do you know now about indie publishing that you wish had been in a room with you at the beginning?

That consistency matters more than perfection. That visibility is part of the job whether you enjoy it or not. That burnout can quietly destroy creativity if you treat yourself like a content-production machine instead of a human being.
I also wish someone had explained earlier that building readership is usually slow and cumulative rather than explosive. Most indie careers are built brick by brick, not lightning strike by lightning strike.
And honestly? I wish someone had told me sooner that the imposter syndrome never fully leaves. You just eventually learn to write while it sits in the corner eating crisps and offering unhelpful commentary.

What’s the question about this book you’ve never been asked but always wanted to answer? And what is that answer?

“Do you think the systems in Signal & Static are evil?”
Not exactly. That’s what makes them dangerous.
Most of the major systems in the series begin from care, protection, preservation, or harm reduction. They become frightening because they slowly prioritise stability over humanity. The Vigil doesn’t wake up wanting cruelty. It wants suffering to stop. But once a system decides emotional friction is the enemy, individuality starts becoming collateral damage.
Pure evil is easy to reject. Comfortable control is much harder.

What’s next, and what’s driving it?

A project called A Perfectly Useless War. A geopolitical thriller about institutional decline and the disconnect between how modern crises are presented and how they’re actually managed behind closed doors. I’m interested in systems that continue functioning administratively long after they’ve stopped functioning morally or strategically.
Tonally, it sits somewhere between a political thriller and a very dry obituary for institutional competence. There’s military fiction in it, but it’s less about battlefield heroics and more about logistics, bureaucracy, career preservation, procurement disasters, and people trying to remain sane inside structures designed to protect themselves first.
Which sounds bleak — and it is — but the moment human beings try to manage catastrophe through PowerPoint presentations and committee language, satire basically arrives uninvited.

Anything else — your platform, your next project, something we didn’t cover, something you just want to say. This space is yours.

If there’s one thing I hope readers take from Signal & Static: messiness is not failure. Memory hurts sometimes. Grief leaves marks. Human beings contradict themselves constantly. We carry emotional noise everywhere we go.
But that noise matters. The systems in Signal & Static are always trying to smooth people into something cleaner, calmer, more manageable. The series argues that our imperfections are part of what make us worth preserving in the first place.
Also: drink water, back up your files, and never trust a city that describes itself as “fully harmonised.”

Find Sterling Vance at sterlingvancebooks.wordpress.com and on Instagram, Facebook, Threads, and Bluesky — all @sterlingvancebooks. Also on Amazon Author Central.

The first two Signal & Static books, Echoes of Erasure and The Silent Vigil are available in ebook and paperback on Amazon. They are also free on Kindle Unlimited.

A Perfectly Useless War is scheduled for release 18th September 2026 and is available to preorder now from both Amazon and Kobo.

Alt...

Black and white portrait photograph of Sterling Vance